Thursday, April 14, 2005

IMPEACHMENT PLOT: A MUCH MORE DENSE MATTER THAN WHAT IT SEEMS

Last night I could take hold of the last third of a taped interview of the prestigious and widely renown lawyer Raul Carrancá y Rivas in channel 19, by Sra. Mayté Noriega.

His talk on the legal aspect of the so much fingered and already over-beaten case of Lopez Obrador impeachment, was very orientating and his quite centered position is reassuring in regards to his impartiality on this regards, he said the offense of contempt of court was committed.

The best came when he expressed his personal opinion as a governed citizen and called Lopez Obrador to submit himself to the law, instead of summoning rallies, and street blockades, etc., advising him that it is the best he can do if he wishes to keep credibility should he aspire to run for office.

But, in the last part, many hard doubts aroused at his comment: He expressed that President Fox has made very serious infringements to the Mexican Constitution. This made me go panicky and I immediately thought of underground prisons, mass killings and did I sweat !!!!!! But then, he said that the list of these infringements has been published by Lic. Ignacio Burgoa Orihuela – another prestigious and highly respected legal expert – in a magazine for jurists and among said infringements are, if I am not wrong:

1.- Decree of one day of national mourning for the demise of Pope John Paul II, accusing him of populism by taking this step.

2.- Saying in an interview that he prayed during the funeral mass of the Pope, because “the President does not get paid for praying”

3.- The announcement by Santiago Creel of something to do with Lopez Obrador impeachment while in a room with the image of President Benito Juárez.

4.- Having changed the text of the speech of acceptance in the ceremony when taking office.

5.- Having sent greetings to his family and friends in the same ceremony.

6.- Having appointed his cabinet members in the same ceremony.

Sr. Carrancá said those were just a few of the serious and dreadful infringements. He went on saying that there are much more alike against the Constitution that sets that the Government, I know this, since Century XIX, must be secular and now, for what I heard, ferociously anti-clerical. Should you know where this magazine is available, please let us know.

While browsing the web to find said magazine, I found that these two legal experts, either individually or in group, have been, were or are in the legal defense team of:

1.- Salvador Atenco Group (Group that violently protested the building of an airport)
2.- René Bejarano (Once closest aide to Lopez Obrador, now also impeached and in jail for corruption case)
3.- Group of lawmakers fighting the controversy by President Fox on the expenses budget.

This is what we have up to date. Do you know of any another defense clearly anti-Fox?

For the moment, no more elements are at hand to get to a clearer conclusion but these statements and the above information (very little as of yet) is provoking hard doubts on the real root and the type of result expected in all this tangle and the way the impeachment has been handled and directed against President Vicente Fox and the Federal Government.

Very serious are the signals being sent abroad claiming that Mexico is “on the verge” of a revolution and the strange thing is that the most serious international news agencies are publishing it.

WHO IS, OR, ARE BEHIND THESE SERIOUS ATTEMPTS OF DESTABILIZATION THAT JEOPARDIZE OUR WAY OF LIFE JUST FOR THE SAKE OF PERSONAL REVENGE BECAUSE THEY DO NOT LIKE TO PRAY?

§§§§§§§§§§§

No comments: